Skip to content
Gradmarc Adtech LLP

Case studyIllustrative write-up · no real client

One console for instruments, samples and blockers

A scheduling and tracking system that replaced three spreadsheets and a shared inbox.

Client
None: illustrative
Industry
Research laboratories
Screens from
Ordwise (concept)

01Challenge

The problem, as it was found

Instrument bookings, sample status and equipment problems were tracked in separate places, so delays were found out late and by accident.

  • Bookings were made by email, and clashes were found on the day
  • Samples moved between teams with no shared status
  • Equipment faults were reported in a shared inbox and easily lost
  • No one could see what was blocking the next piece of work

Context

The lab ran several instruments with limited availability, shared by teams with different priorities. Scheduling was social: people knew who to ask.

That worked until the lab grew. The goal was not to replace the people who coordinated, but to give them a view of the whole picture.

02System

How it was put together

A web application with a schedule at its core, linked to samples and faults through shared identifiers.

L1 · Calendar and board views

Interface

  • Schedule
  • Sample list
  • Blocker board

L2 · Booking rules

API

  • Bookings
  • Samples
  • Faults
  • Notifications

L3 · Relational model

Data

  • Instruments
  • Bookings
  • Samples
  • Fault log

L4 · Background work

Jobs

  • Reminders
  • Overdue checks

Path through the system

  1. 1Booking requested
  2. 2Clash check
  3. 3Slot confirmed
  4. 4Sample linked
  5. 5Reminder sent

03What was built

The parts, in the order they shipped

  1. 01

    Instrument scheduling

    A booking view per instrument that prevents clashes and shows who holds the next slot.

  2. 02

    Sample tracking

    A status for each sample as it moves through preparation, measurement and review.

  3. 03

    Blocker board

    A list of what is stopping work, with an owner for each item.

  4. 04

    Fault reporting

    A structured way to report an equipment problem, linked to the instrument and its upcoming bookings.

Ordwise operations overview with four metric cards, a 30-day orders and dispatches chart, warehouse bars and a table of orders needing attention.
The overview shows volume, service level and what needs attention now. Concept screen.
Ordwise orders list filtered to exceptions, with one delayed order open in a side drawer showing items, a shipment timeline and a suggested action.
Exceptions open in a drawer with the shipment timeline and a suggested action. Concept screen.

04Decisions

The choices that shaped it

  1. Decision 1

    Prevent clashes in the data, not in the interface

    Why

    A booking rule enforced only on screen can be bypassed by a second tab or an import.

    Trade-off

    More careful database design up front.

  2. Decision 2

    A blocker is a first-class object

    Why

    Delays were the real pain, and they had no home in the old tools.

    Trade-off

    One more concept for users to learn, which paid off quickly.

  3. Decision 3

    Notifications are quiet by default

    Why

    Over-notifying trains people to ignore the system.

    Trade-off

    Some users asked for more, so the settings are adjustable.

05Technology

What it was built with

Drawn from our confirmed capability stack. Illustrative for this demo.
Frontend
Next.jsReactTypeScript
Backend
Node.jsExpress.jsREST APIs
Database
PostgreSQL
Cloud and DevOps
DockerGitHub Actions

06Outcome

Gave the lab one place to see what is booked, what is in progress and what is blocked.

  • Scheduling clashes are prevented at the point of booking
  • Samples and instruments share a single, current status
  • Blockers have owners and are visible to everyone who needs them

Demo case study. Outcomes are qualitative. No metrics, savings, revenue or user figures are claimed.

Have something worth building?

Tell us what you want to build. A short brief is enough to start the conversation.